Hi,
Would it be possible to have signed version of the LexActivator assemblies from NuGet? My current project uses strong naming and this is a complication to introduce unsigned assemblies from NuGet.
Signed packages can easily be consumed by any projects, but signed project need signed dependencies.
Strong naming reference: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/nuget/introducing-signed-package-submissions/
Thanks!
Hi Vincent,
I recommend using following:
Regards,
Adnan
It’s what I ended up using, yes. I’d still prefer signed sources but this works.
The latest version of LexActivator is now signed with a strong name key. So, you don’t need to disable it anymore.
Yay!
I was running into issues with StrongNamer borking components that we bought that extend the VS designer. Neither I nor the vendor could figure out exactly how, but removing it fixed the designer every time - then I couldn’t use Cryptlex, since my assemblies need to be signed and strong-named (Office add-ins require it). I ended up creating a complicated workaround so I could call Cryptlex through a command line app.
FWIW, Cryptlex wasn’t the only library creating this conundrum for me, but it did cost me a lot of development time till I came up with aforementioned complicated workaround.